185 lines
8.9 KiB
Markdown
185 lines
8.9 KiB
Markdown
|
# Code of Conduct
|
||
|
|
||
|
GNOME Settings is a project developed based on GNOME Code of Conduct and GitHub's community
|
||
|
guidelines. You can read it below:
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Summary
|
||
|
|
||
|
GNOME creates software for a better world. We achieve this by behaving well towards
|
||
|
each other.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Therefore this document suggests what we consider ideal behaviour, so you know what
|
||
|
to expect when getting involved in GNOME. This is who we are and what we want to be.
|
||
|
There is no official enforcement of these principles, and this should not be interpreted
|
||
|
like a legal document.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Advice
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **Be respectful and considerate**: Disagreement is no excuse for poor behaviour or personal
|
||
|
attacks. Remember that a community where people feel uncomfortable is not a productive one.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **Be patient and generous**: If someone asks for help it is because they need it. Do politely
|
||
|
suggest specific documentation or more appropriate venues where appropriate, but avoid
|
||
|
aggressive or vague responses such as "RTFM".
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **Assume people mean well**: Remember that decisions are often a difficult choice between
|
||
|
competing priorities. If you disagree, please do so politely. If something seems outrageous,
|
||
|
check that you did not misinterpret it. Ask for clarification, but do not assume the worst.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **Try to be concise**: Avoid repeating what has been said already. Making a conversation larger
|
||
|
makes it difficult to follow, and people often feel personally attacked if they receive multiple
|
||
|
messages telling them the same thing.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as
|
||
|
contributors and maintainers pledge to making participation in our project and
|
||
|
our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body
|
||
|
size, disability, ethnicity, gender identity and expression, level of experience,
|
||
|
nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and
|
||
|
orientation.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Communication Guidelines
|
||
|
|
||
|
It is of ultimate importance to maintain a community in which everyone feels free to express
|
||
|
themselves, review, and comment on each others ideas, both technical and otherwise. Correspondingly,
|
||
|
an environment in which individuals are silenced, berated, or are otherwise afraid to speak up is
|
||
|
unlikely to foster fruitful dialog.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Everyone interacting with members of the community should always keep in mind the asymmetry of
|
||
|
communication: while your interaction with community members (and in particular, maintainers and
|
||
|
long-term contributors) may be singular and fleeting, these members generally interact with a high
|
||
|
volume of individuals each day. Before writing a comment, opening a new issue, or engaging as part
|
||
|
of any forum or IRC discussion, please take a moment to appreciate that fact.
|
||
|
|
||
|
While communicating, it is expected that all involved participants be respectful and civil at all
|
||
|
times and refrain from personal attacks.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Communication Rules
|
||
|
|
||
|
The following behavior will not be tolerated on any occasion:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **Threats of violence**: You may not threaten violence towards others or use the site to organize,
|
||
|
promote, or incite acts of real-world violence or terrorism. Think carefully about the words you
|
||
|
use, the images you post, and even the software you write, and how they may be interpreted by
|
||
|
others. Even if you mean something as a joke, it might not be received that way. If you think
|
||
|
that someone else might interpret the content you post as a threat or as promoting violence or
|
||
|
terrorism, stop. Don't post it. In extraordinary cases, we may report threats of violence to law
|
||
|
enforcement if we think there may be a genuine risk of physical harm or a threat to public safety.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **Hate speech and discrimination**: While it is not forbidden to broach topics such as age, body
|
||
|
size, disability, ethnicity, gender identity and expression, level of experience, nationality,
|
||
|
personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation, we do not tolerate speech
|
||
|
that attacks a person or group of people on the basis of who they are. When approached in an
|
||
|
aggressive or insulting manner these (and other) sensitive topics can make others feel unwelcome,
|
||
|
or perhaps even unsafe. While there's always the potential for misunderstandings, we expect our
|
||
|
community members to remain respectful and civil when discussing sensitive topics.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **Bullying and harassment**: We do not tolerate bullying, harassment, or any other means of
|
||
|
habitual badgering or intimidation targeted at a specific person or group of people. In general,
|
||
|
if your actions are unwanted and you cease to terminate this form of engagement, there is a good
|
||
|
chance that your behavior will be classified as bullying or harassment.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **Impersonation**: You may not seek to mislead others as to your identity by copying another
|
||
|
person's avatar, posting content under their email address, using a similar username, or otherwise
|
||
|
posing as someone else. Impersonation and identity theft is a form of harassment.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **Doxxing and invasion of privacy**: Don't post other people's personal information, such as phone
|
||
|
numbers, private email addresses, physical addresses, credit card numbers, Social Security/National
|
||
|
Identity numbers, or passwords. Depending on the context, we may consider such behavior to be an
|
||
|
invasion of privacy, with particularly egregious examples potentially escalating to the point of
|
||
|
legal action, such as when the released material presents a safety risk to the subject.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* **Obscene content**: In essence, do not post pornography, gore, or any other depiction of violence.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### General Advice
|
||
|
|
||
|
The following advice will help to increase the efficiency of communication with community members:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Do not post "me too" comments. Use the GitLab reactions instead, e.g. “thumbs up” or “thumbs down”.
|
||
|
* Avoid adding priority, time, or relevance hints if you are not involved with the development of
|
||
|
the application. For example, `“This is an urgent issue”`, or `“This should be fixed now”`, or
|
||
|
even `“The majority of users need this feature”`.
|
||
|
* Do not use passive-aggressive communication tactics.
|
||
|
* When reporting technical problems with the application, such as misbehavior or crashes, focus on
|
||
|
sharing as many details as possible and avoid adding non-technical information to it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
An example of a **good** issue report:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
GNOME Settings crashes when opening the Wi-Fi panel with 3+ Wi-Fi adapters
|
||
|
|
||
|
Steps to reproduce (assuming 3+ Wi-Fi adapters are present):
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. Open GNOME Settings
|
||
|
2. Select the Wi-Fi panel
|
||
|
3. Observe the crash
|
||
|
|
||
|
This does not happen with 2 or less adapters. Here is a backtrace of the
|
||
|
crash: backtrace.txt
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
In contrast, here is an example of a **bad** issue report:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
GNOME Settings crashed while I was trying to connect to the internet. How can such
|
||
|
a thing happen and nobody notice? Did you not test it before releasing it?
|
||
|
|
||
|
This should be fixed as quick as possible!
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
* When asking for new features, try and add as much information as possible to justify its relevance,
|
||
|
why should it not be implemented as an auxiliary program, what problems it would solve, and offer
|
||
|
suggestions about how you think it should be implemented.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Example of a **good** feature request:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
GNOME Settings needs to expose IPv6 options
|
||
|
|
||
|
As of now, the connection editor dialog does not allow editing various IPv6
|
||
|
options. This is relevant because without some of these options, it is not
|
||
|
possible to have a valid IPv6 configuration and, consequently, not have access
|
||
|
to various websites and services.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The list of missing configurations that are essential is:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* <Feature A>
|
||
|
* <Feature B>
|
||
|
|
||
|
Optionally, the following configurations can also be added:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* <Feature C>
|
||
|
* <Feature D>
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here is a quick sketch I have made showing how I think these options
|
||
|
should be exposed as a user interface: sketch.png.
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
Example of a **bad** feature request:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
Merge GNOME Tweaks in GNOME Settings
|
||
|
|
||
|
The options in GNOME Tweaks are absolutely essential to the majority of us
|
||
|
users. Why was it not merged already? This is an urgent issue and should
|
||
|
have been addressed years ago. You should allocate all your resources on
|
||
|
merging those two applications.
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
### What happens if someone breaks these rules or guidelines?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Actions that may be taken in response to an abusive comment include but are not limited to:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Content removal (when breaking any of the guidelines or rules)
|
||
|
* Content blocking (when breaking any of the guidelines or rules)
|
||
|
* Formal report to the Code of Conduct Committee (when breaking any of the rules)
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Attribution
|
||
|
|
||
|
This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,
|
||
|
available at [http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4][version]
|
||
|
|
||
|
[homepage]: http://contributor-covenant.org
|
||
|
[version]: http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/
|
||
|
[maintainers]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/blob/main/docs/MAINTAINERS.md
|