Refactor the setting to make unit test easier (#22405)
Some bugs caused by less unit tests in fundamental packages. This PR refactor `setting` package so that create a unit test will be easier than before. - All `LoadFromXXX` files has been splited as two functions, one is `InitProviderFromXXX` and `LoadCommonSettings`. The first functions will only include the code to create or new a ini file. The second function will load common settings. - It also renames all functions in setting from `newXXXService` to `loadXXXSetting` or `loadXXXFrom` to make the function name less confusing. - Move `XORMLog` to `SQLLog` because it's a better name for that. Maybe we should finally move these `loadXXXSetting` into the `XXXInit` function? Any idea? --------- Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2b02343e21
commit
c53ad052d8
86 changed files with 1694 additions and 1464 deletions
|
@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ var Webhook = struct {
|
|||
ProxyHosts: []string{},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func newWebhookService() {
|
||||
sec := Cfg.Section("webhook")
|
||||
func loadWebhookFrom(rootCfg ConfigProvider) {
|
||||
sec := rootCfg.Section("webhook")
|
||||
Webhook.QueueLength = sec.Key("QUEUE_LENGTH").MustInt(1000)
|
||||
Webhook.DeliverTimeout = sec.Key("DELIVER_TIMEOUT").MustInt(5)
|
||||
Webhook.SkipTLSVerify = sec.Key("SKIP_TLS_VERIFY").MustBool()
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue