Fix#28157
This PR fix the possible bugs about actions schedule.
## The Changes
- Move `UpdateRepositoryUnit` and `SetRepoDefaultBranch` from models to
service layer
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when actions unit has been disabled
or global disabled.
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when default branch changed.
Fix#27722Fix#27357Fix#25837
1. Fix the typo `BlockingByDependenciesNotPermitted`, which causes the
`not permitted message` not to show. The correct one is `Blocking` or
`BlockedBy`
2. Rewrite the perm check. The perm check uses a very tricky way to
avoid duplicate checks for a slice of issues, which is confusing. In
fact, it's also the reason causing the bug. It uses `lastRepoID` and
`lastPerm` to avoid duplicate checks, but forgets to assign the
`lastPerm` at the end of the code block. So I rewrote this to avoid this
trick.

3. It also reuses the `blocks` slice, which is even more confusing. So I
rewrote this too.

When creating a pull request, allow directly assigning it to a project,
as it is already possible for issues.
After:

Redesign repo header with following new aspects:
- responsive & better-looking repo title
- hide repo button text instead of icons in mobile view
- use same tab style as on explore and org page
<details>
<summary>Before:</summary>




</details>
<details>
<summary>After:</summary>




The current rpm repository places all packages in the same repository,
and different systems (el7,f34) may hit packages that do not belong to
this distribution ( #25304 ) , which now supports grouping of rpm.

Fixes#25304 .
Fixes#27056 .
Refactor: [#25866](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25866)
Follow GitHubs behavior of showing the label description as a tooltip
instead of the browser native title.
## Before

## After

Since #20805, code can be hidden.
However, the related settings are still shown even though they don't
have any meaning then.
5fdee54d-ac81-418a-82f7-eadff048cedd
Mainly for MySQL/MSSQL.
It is important for Gitea to use case-sensitive database charset
collation. If the database is using a case-insensitive collation, Gitea
will show startup error/warning messages, and show the errors/warnings
on the admin panel's Self-Check page.
Make `gitea doctor convert` work for MySQL to convert the collations of
database & tables & columns.
* Fix#28131
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
It is not quite breaking, but it's highly recommended to convert the
database&table&column to a consistent and case-sensitive collation.
- If there's a error with the Git command in `checkIfPRContentChanged`
the stderr wasn't concatendated to the error, which results in still not
knowing why an error happend.
- Adds concatenation for stderr to the returned error.
- Ref: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2077
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Gitea prefers to use relative URLs in code (to make multiple domain work
for some users)
So it needs to use `toAbsoluteUrl` to generate a full URL when click
"Reference in New Issues"
And add some comments in the test code
In #26851, it assumed that `Commit` always exists when
`PageIsDiff==true`.
But for a 404 page, the `Commit` doesn't exist, so the following code
would cause panic because nil value can't be passed as string parameter
to `IsMultilineCommitMessage(string)` (or the StringUtils.Cut in later
PRs)
User can select access repo or owner's home page.
Before:

After:

In the commit 5a56f9699c (3.) the min-height was applied to all wiki
elements. This resulted in huge blank spaces when viewing the wiki.
This fixes this by only applying the min-height to the preview when
editing.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2080
(cherry picked from commit 8f0baefe5d)
Co-authored-by: Fl1tzi <git@fl1tzi.com>
In #26365 issue references were disabled entirely for documents,
intending to match GitHub behavior. However cross-references do appear
to work in documents on GitHub.
This is useful for example to write release notes in a markdown document
and reference issues. While the simpler syntax may create links when not
intended, hopefully the cross-reference syntax is unique enough to avoid
it.
There was a question about "how to improve the datetime display for
SSH/PGP/WebAuthn"
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28262#issuecomment-1831141611
The root problem is that `DateTime` misses the "data-tooltip-content"
attribute, which should be used to make the tooltip popup smoothly.
Now the UI is consistent and the end users could see the detailed
hour/minute/second easily by hovering the element.


- Resolves https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22493
- Related to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/4520
Some admins prefer all timestamps to display the full date instead of
relative time. They can do that now by setting
```ini
[ui]
PREFERRED_TIMESTAMP_TENSE = absolute
```
This setting is set to `mixed` by default, allowing dates to render as
"5 hours ago". Here are some screenshots of the UI with this setting set
to `absolute`:



---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28547#issuecomment-1867740842
Since https://gitea.com/xorm/xorm/pulls/2383 merged, xorm now supports
UPDATE JOIN.
To keep consistent from different databases, xorm use
`engine.Join().Update`, but the actural generated SQL are different
between different databases.
For MySQL, it's `UPDATE talbe1 JOIN table2 ON join_conditions SET xxx
Where xxx`.
For MSSQL, it's `UPDATE table1 SET xxx FROM TABLE1, TABLE2 WHERE
join_conditions`.
For SQLITE per https://www.sqlite.org/lang_update.html, sqlite support
`UPDATE table1 SET xxx FROM table2 WHERE join conditions` from
3.33.0(2020-8-14).
POSTGRES is the same as SQLITE.
I noticed the `BuildAllRepositoryFiles` function under the Alpine folder
is unused and I thought it was a bug.
But I'm not sure about this. Was it on purpose?
Fixes#28534
---
Before:

After:
<img width="304" alt="image"
src="53d04ad0-6d5c-47e2-8a7d-30a4d5dd9959">
Should we also apply this for long filenames in Assets?
It looks like this currently:
<img width="285" alt="image"
src="e2dcbb2e-30d5-4e35-b304-6274ef60bda7">
---------
Co-authored-by: Mihir <mihir.joshi@senpiper.com>