It is possible to use weak passwords in dialogs currently, which is
not intentional and leads to problems in case of changing password of
current user. This regression was introduced by Bug 780002, which added
new strength level for weak passwords. Let's reflect the new level also
when setting sensitivity...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788122
Most panel desktop files have an OnlyShowIn entry to display them
in the previous iconish G-C-C UI. Some distributions (like ubuntu) prefers
adding new panel rather than patching the existing ones to ensure that
the upstream Control Center look it preserved under a vanilla GNOME session.
This patch fix thus the new layout setting to respect the OnlyShowIn property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787347
It looks better to present the fallback app menu in the headerbar
instead.
This change assumes that client side decorations will be available,
and therefore a GtkHeaderBar.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786692
When application menus are not supported by the desktop environment
or are disabled, Gtk+ makes the menu available with a fallback. For
client-side decorations the fallback consists of adding a menu
button at the begining of the titlebar. Since g-c-c has a split
headerbar, we need to explicitly handle the decoration layout.
This commit forces the "menu" to belong to the left headerbar, and
leaves the other buttons to ble placed at the right headerbar.
The "show-close-button" property has to be set in order to present
any type of decoration buttons in the header bar.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786692
When we add the NetDevice pointer to the GPtrArray, we have
a single reference owned by the panel. When iterating over
this GPtrArray, no reference is taken.
The problem is that the code to handle command-line arguments
was unreferencing the NetDevices when iterating over it,
creating a disparity in the ref/unref pairs.
Fix that by simply not unreferencing the NetDevice instance
when iterating over it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786514
The way it works is independent of the service so there's no reason
not to show it. We should also hide the remote-control-box widget
hierarchy since those can't be used here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786565
